Robinhood Chain meme losses: Only 41% of Wallets Are in Profit
Robinhood Chain meme losses are now on the record: Dune data shows only 41% of wallets in the nine biggest memes are in profit, while chain activity keeps cooling.
Early story. Some claims here are not officially confirmed yet. We update this post as it confirms.

- Across the nine most popular memes, covering 373,000 wallets and 540,000 positions, only 41% of wallets show a positive balance.
- Typical buyers of well-known memes are down 1.7%, while typical buyers of random Pons V1 tokens are down 67%.
- Daily transactions on Robinhood Chain fell 42% to 6.2 million (October 2 to 8) from 10.8 million in mid-September.
in this block
Robinhood Chain meme losses now have hard numbers behind them. On-chain analyst obchakevich_ ran Dune queries on memecoin holdings tied to Robinhood's network and found that most wallets are underwater, and the random launchpad stuff is brutal. At the same time, CoinDesk data shows overall chain activity cooling fast.
What actually happened
ChainCatcher summarized the obchakevich_ study, which covers June 1 to October 8, 2026, counts positions starting from $10 and identifies traders by token flow. Besides the nine big memes, it tracked another 160,000 positions in random tokens across four launchpads.
None of the popular-meme groups reached half of wallets in profit. On the random side, the share of profitable holders was 36.7% on Noxa, 33.2% on Doppler and 14.7% on Pons V1. Of 355 random tokens with at least 10 buyers, only 5, or 1.4%, left most buyers in profit.
Graduating from the bonding curve didn't save anyone either. About 2% of Pons V2 launches made it into a liquidity pool, and only 36% of positions in those tokens were green.
One wording note: ChainCatcher's English text says the analysis covers meme holdings "on Robinhood Crypto." The launchpads named, like Pons and Noxa, operate on Robinhood Chain, so we read it as chain data, but the phrasing is theirs.
Who actually made money
The profit is concentrated in heavy traders. Positions bought and sold only once were about one-third profitable, while 59% of positions with 51 to 200 transactions were positive. Positions with at least 11 transactions made up just 14% of the total but captured 89% of realized profit, or $165 million out of $185 million.
Translation: active traders farmed the flow, and casual buyers paid for it. That fits the PvP vibe of most launchpad cycles, and it's why "number go up" screenshots tell you nothing about the median wallet.
The chain is cooling too
CoinDesk reported on October 10, using growthepie data, that Robinhood Chain averaged 6.2 million daily transactions from October 2 to 8. That's down 42% from 10.8 million during September 10 to 16, and down 20% from the week before. Daily active addresses fell 31%. Weekly spot volume dropped 21% to $7.45 billion, though deposits stayed above $1 billion and perpetual futures volume rose 26%.
The fee picture is messy, and sources describe it differently. AiCoin says a 90-day free gas subsidy ended on September 29 and cooled high-frequency trading. CoinDesk says Robinhood will keep covering network fees on token swaps worth more than 50 cents through December 31. Both can be true for different programs, but we're not merging them.
AiCoin also reports PONS fell roughly 56% to 58% from its September 5 peak and CASHCAT dropped more than 50% from its high. Those are dated figures from that report, not live prices. The same report says the chain's daily DEX volume peaked around $3.7 billion in early September before sliding to about $1.9 billion by mid-to-late September. It also estimates that the main Robinhood Wallet app path accounted for only about 1% to 2% of on-chain transactions at the peak, meaning most of the action came from crypto-native terminals, not regular Robinhood users.
Why it matters for memecoin traders
These Robinhood Chain meme losses look a lot like what we've seen on other launchpads: a few winners, a long tail of dead coins and profits flowing to bots and grinders. Our earlier pieces on Pons launchpad volume and the Hood Inu crash show the same pattern from different angles.
The data also explains why random launchpad tokens are a different sport from holding a top meme. A 1.7% median loss on popular coins hurts. A 67% median loss on random Pons V1 tokens is a wipeout.
What to do as a reader
If you trade on Robinhood Chain, size every random launch as if it will go to zero, because the data says it usually does. Track your own realized profit and loss instead of trusting community leaderboards.
Watch whether the fee coverage through December 31 brings activity back or just props up wash volume. For context on how stock-flavored memes fit in, read our Robinhood stock memes breakdown. Nothing here is investment advice.
Not financial advice. DYOR, ser.